← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2247/2018disposed off

Dr. ( Smt.) Lily Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-03-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No.2247 of 2018 • Dr. ( Smt.) Lily Sahu W/o W/o Laxman Sahu Aged About 49 Years Working As Lecturer (Hindi), J. R. Dani Govt. Girls Multipurpose Higher Secondary School, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan,new Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director, Public Instruction, Indravati Bhawan, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Collector, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. District Education Officer, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Tarun Dadsena, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Shri S. Majid Ali, Dy.GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 13/03/2018 Heard.

1.

Though, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that earlier when writ petition was filed, on misconception of facts, statement was made before the Court that the petition is rendered infructuous for the reason that the petitioner was hopeful that some orders are going to be passed for redressal of her grievance. However, no orders have been passed till date, consequently, the petitioner has to file the instant petition. 2.

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would pray that the respondents may be directed for consideration of her representation within a specified period in view of the grounds raised in the petition that the transfer is in violation of the transfer policy.

3.

Without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is finally

disposed off with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the petitioner's representation on such grounds as may be raised. The petitioner may submit a fresh representation along with a copy of this order for consideration before the respondent authority. Let decision be taken by the transferring authority within a period of six weeks from the date of submission of representation.

SD/- ( Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) J U D G E Tumane