Dr. Satish Kumar Panda v. Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission And ORS

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Appeal No. 241 of 2014 Dr. Satish Kumar Panda S/O Shri Basudev Panda Aged About 39 years Occupation Reader Kayachikitsa On Contractual Basis At Government Ayurved College Raipur C.G. Permanent Address Remja Power House Para Brajraj Nagar, P.S. Brajraj Nagar Distt. Jhasuguda Orissa.

---- Appellant

Versus

1. Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission Through Its Secretary Shankar Nagar, Road Raipur, P.S. Civil Lines, Tahsil & District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Health & Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, P.S. Naya Raipur Tahsil & District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. The Director Ayurveda, Yoga And Naturopathy, Unani Siddha & Homeopathy (Ayush), Directorate, GE Road, Raipur, P.S. Sarswati Nagar Tahsil & District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

4. Dr. Aruna Ojha, aged about 39 years, D/O Late Shri Ram Pher Ojha, R/O Santoshi Nagar Raipur, P.S. Sarswati Nagar, Tahsil and District Raipur Chhattisgarh. Presently Posted As Lecturer At Khushi Lal Sharma Govt. (Autonomous) Ayurveda College & Institute Bhopal, (MP) ---- Respondents For Appellant :

Shri S.C. Verma, Advocate.

For Respondent No.1 :

Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate.

For Respondents No.2 & 3 :

Shri B. Gopa Kumar, Deputy Advocate General.

For Respondent No.4 :

Shri Yogesh Pandey, Advocate.

HON'BLE SHRI NAVIN SINHA, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON'BLE SHRI P. SAM KOSHY, J.

Order On Board Per NAVIN SINHA, C.J.

02/07/2015 1.

Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that without prejudice to its rights and contentions the appeal may be permitted to be withdrawn at this stage in view of the withdrawal of Writ Petition (S) No. 1229 of 2013 (Dr. Aruna Ojha vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others) by Respondent

No.4, reserving the right to pursue matters further in accordance with law, if necessary.

2.

Learned Counsel for the Respondents have no objection to the same.

3.

We may only observe that any appointment is required to be made strictly in accordance with law and the merit position in the panel, if any. 4.

The writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- Sd/- (Navin Sinha) (P. Sam Koshy) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE sunita