← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2576/2017disposed off

Smt. Sunita Kathautiya v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-09-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.2576 of 2017 Smt. Sunita Kathautiya W/o Shri Dhaneshwar Kathautiya, Aged About 31 Years Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Tusma, Janpad Panchayat Nawagarh, R/o Village & Post Tusma, Police Station Shivarinarayan, Tahsil Nawgarh, Civil & Revenue Distridct- Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary Department Of Panchayat & Rural Developmen Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Additional Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, Civil & Reventu District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Collector Janjgir, Civil & Reventu District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh.

4. Sub- Divisional Officer (Revenue) Janjgir, Civil & Reventu District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh.

5. Smt. Gomti Gopi Sahu, W/o Shri Gopi Sahu Aged About 36 Years Janpad Panchayat Member No. 23 Janpad Panchayt Nawagarh, R/o Village & Post Tusma, Pollice Station Shivarinarayan, Tahsil Nawagarh, Civil & Reventu District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh.

--- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Ramesh Nayak, Advocate For State/Respondents :

Mr. Shashank Thakur, Govt. Advocate and Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 19/09/2017 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the ex-parte interim order dated 07.09.2017 has been passed by the Additional Commissioner while entertaining the appeal.

(2) On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the respective respondents would oppose the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

(3) I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order.

(4) Be that as it may, the Additional Commissioner, Bilaspur is directed to hear and decide the appeal and also on the question of interim order and to pass bi parte order expeditiously preferably within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order. (5) With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-