← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2214/2019disposed off

Gautam Ram Pandey v. The State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-03-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2214 of 2019

1. Gautam Ram Pandey S/o Chhedan Ram Pandey Aged About 36 Years By Occupation Assistant Teacher L. B. Govt. Primary School, Kamela, Block Kondagaon, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh

2. Ajeet Ram Thakur S/o Feru Ram Thakur Aged About 30 Years By Occupation Assistant Teacher L. B. Govt. Primary School, Kamela, Block Kondagaon, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh

3. Sukhdev Netam S/o Manglu Ram Netam Aged About 35 Years By Occupation Assistant Teacher L. B. Govt. Primary School, Mariguda, Block Kondagaon, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh

4. Baldev Singh Korram S/o Sondhar Korram Aged About 31 Years By Occupation Assistant Teacher L. B. Govt. Primary School, Dongariguda, Block Kondagaon, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh

5. Dineshvari Patel W/o Devikumar Patel Aged About 35 Years By Occupation Assistant Teacher L. B. Govt. Primary School, Khutguda, Block Kondagaon, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education, Department, Mahanandi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanandi Bhawan, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh,

3. District Education Officer District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, Kondagaon, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For petitioner :

Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. P. Acharya, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 28/03/2019

1. Ignoring the defaults pointed out by the Registry, with the consent of the parties the matter is heard finally and disposed of at the motion stage itself.

2. The Challenge in this petition is that though the petitioners were intially appointed as Shiksha Karmi Grade-III and have subsequently been absorbed to the Education Department, they have by now completed 10 years of service and therefore they are entitled for the benefit of Karmonnati as per rules governing the field, however the respondents till date have not granted the said benefit to the petitioners.

3. Given the limited grievance which the petitioners have raised, let the petitioners made a suitable representation to the respondents No. 3 & 4 within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the respondents No. 3 & 4, in turn, shall take a decision on the granting of Kramonnati to the petitioners within a further period of 90 days.

4. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed off. Sd/- ( P. Sam Koshy) Jyoti JUDGE