Ramprasad v. State Of Chhattisgarh

1 WPC No. 953 of 2019 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 953 of 2019

1. Ramprasad S/o Shri Mahetaru, Aged About 52 Years, Village Pendridih, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

2. Mahetaru, S/o Late Shri Aatmaram, Aged About 79 Years, Village - Pendridih, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Ministry, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Rakhi, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. District Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Bilha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner(s) :- Shri Tapan Kumar Chandra, Advocate.

For Respondent :- Shri Ashish Surana, PL Order On Board By Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.

2 WPC No. 953 of 2019 12/03/2019

1. In the present petition, it is contended that though the land of the petitioners were acquired and the compensation was paid, but the rehabilitation grant on the basis of the Notification dated 04.01.2017, which was published in an extraordinary Gazette of Chhattisgarh, has not been given. It is further contended that the petitioners have made necessary representation to the concerned authorities, therefore, the authorities may be directed to decide the representation.

2. Without entering into the merits of the case, considering the limited prayer, it is directed that if the petitioners make a fresh representation before the concerned Collector, the Collector may decide the same objectively within a period of 3 months.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Judge Ankit