Nan Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 703 of 2018
1. Nan Singh S/o Late Nankarru, Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Kudekela, P.O. Kudekela, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2. Collector, Janjgir Champa/ Collector-Cum-Officiating Dy. Secretary, Government Of Chhattisgarh (Appropriate Government In Land Acquisition Matters Under Acquisition For Ministry Of Road, Transport And Highways) District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.
3. The SDO-Cum-Land Acquisition Officer, Champa, (Competent Authority For Hearing Of Objections In Land Acquisition Matters) District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.
4. The Dy. Secretary, National Highway Authority Government Of India (In Exercise Of Power Conferred By Clause A Of Section 3 Of National Highways Act 1956), Raipur Chhattisgarh.
5. Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Rashtriya Rajmarg Parikshetra, Raipur Chhattisgarh.
6. Commissioner, Income Tax Department, Mahima Complex, Vyapar Vihar Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
7. Dhaneshwar Singh Sidar, S/o Badal Singh Sidar, Aged About 65 Years R/o Toliadih, Tahsil Sakti, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent For Petitioner Shri Sanjay Kumar Agrawal, Adv.
For Respondent/State Shri Shashank Thakur, Govt. Adv.
For Respondent/NHAI Ms. Fouzia Mirza, Advocate
Order On Board By Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.
26/11/2018 1.
In view of the fact that the respondents have taken a stand that the petitioner's land has neither been acquired nor used for construction of NH 200 contrary to the petitioner's submission that his land has been used for such construction, the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Champa, is directed to demarcate the land belonging to the petitioner and show to him his land bearing Khasra No.146/2 & 146/3 on the spot and erect the boundary wall by poles with Barbed Wire fencing. The expenses of which shall be borne by the petitioner.
2.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Gowri