Subodh Kumar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

1 WPC No. 943 of 2019 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 943 of 2019 • Subodh Kumar (Wrongly Mentioned As Santosh In Compensation Chart Sl. No. 244) S/o Shri Deendayal , Aged About 47 Years, R/o Near Hatri Chowk Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Ministry Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Post Office And Police Sation Rakhi, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. District Collector, Janjgir - Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.

3. Sub - Divisional Officer (Revenue ) Dabhara, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.

4. Tahsildar, Dabhra, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner :- Shri Tapan Kumar Chandra, Adv.

For Respondent-State :- Shri Sudeep Verma, Dy. G.A.

Order On Board By Hon'ble Justice Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra

2 WPC No. 943 of 2019 12/03/2019 1.

In the present petition, it is contended that though the land of the petitioner was acquired and the compensation was paid, but the rehabilitation grant on the basis of the Notification dated 04.01.2017, which was published in an extraordinary Gazette of Chhattisgarh, has not been given. It is further contended that the petitioner has made necessary representation to the concerned authorities, therefore, the authorities may be directed to decide the representation. 2.

Without entering into the merits of the case, considering the limited prayer, it is directed that if the petitioner make a fresh representation before the concerned Collector, the Collector may decide the same objectively within a period of 3 months.

3.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Ankit