Reena Gupta v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1965 of 2021
1. Reena Gupta W/o Shri Bikas Kumar Shah Aged About 38 Years Occupation Service , Posted As Pharmacist Grade Ii At Central Jail Durg, District Durg , R/o Plot No. 26, Roshan Vihar, Near Bharat Gas Godam , Dhanora, Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh
2. Shailendra Kumar Kela S/o Shri Poonamchand Kela Aged About 32 Years Occupation Service , Posted As Pharmacist Grade Ii At Sub Jail Katghora , District Korba , R/o Jail Colony Katghora, Korba , District Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Home (Jail) Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Finance , Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. State Of Chhattisgarh Through General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
4. Director General Of Jail And Reformative Services Headquarter Of Jail , Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
5. Superintendent Of Jail Central Jail Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh
6. Assistant Superintendent Of Jail Sub Jail Katghora, District Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ----Respondents For the Petitioners :
Mr. Surfaraj Khan, Advocate For the Respondents/State :
Mr. Rahul Jha, G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board /03/2021
1. The grievance of the petitioners are that there is disparity in the salary payable to the Pharmacist grade-2 in the other Department of the state to the petitioners who are working in the Jail Department.
2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that they have already made a detailed representation in this regard before respondent No.1 and 4 and they be directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with rules and regulations.
3. Particularly, keeping in view the recommendations made by Mr. V. N. Tiwari, committee. Given the limited relief that the petitioner has sought for, the writ petition at this juncture stands disposed for directing the respondents 1 and 4 to take an appropriate decision in accordance with the rules and regulations at the earliest preferably within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Parul