High Court Of ChhattisgarhWP227/759/2017disposed off

Samundri Bai v. Bhim Prasad Gupta

2017-10-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (227) No.759 of 2017 Samundri Bai W/o Late Ramdewas By Caste Kanwar, R/o Sitapur, P. S. & Tahsil Sitapur District Surguja Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Bhim Prasad Gupta S/o Arjun Prasad Gupta Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Sitapur, P. S. & Tahsil Sitapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh

2. Sukhdev Prasad Gupta S/o Vidhyachal Sao Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Sitapur, P. S. & Tahsil Sitapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh

3. Ropan S/o Dharam Sai Aged About 42 Years By Caste Manjhi, R/o Village Aara, Tahsil Sitapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh

4. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Additional Collector, Sitapur, District Surguja Chhattisgrh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Vivek Tripathi, Advocate For State : Mr. Aditya Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 24/10/2017 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the State would submit that impugned order dated 20.12.2016 passed by Additional Commissioner, Surguja is revisable before the Board of Revenue under Section 50 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code. (2) At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner may be permitted to prefer the revision before the Board of Revenue within a period of 30 days

from today.

(3) The prayer appears to be fair and reasonable. (4) The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to prefer the revision before the Board of Revenue. If such revision is filed by the petitioner within a period of 30 days from today and, in turn, the Board of Revenue shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the parties expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order along with revision. (5) The certified copy of the impugned order be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioner, after furnishing an attested photocopy thereof.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-