Rudreshwari Mahila Swa Sahayata Samooh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2826 of 2017

1. Rudreshwari Mahila Swa Sahayata Samooh through its Secretary, VillageGhunchapali, Sector Village- Chhuipali, Tehsil- Saraipali, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

2. Jai Ambe Mahila Swa Sahayata Samooh, through its Secretary, VillageChhattigirola, Sector Village- Rudha, Tehsil- Saraipali, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh through its Secretary, Department of Woman and Child Welfare, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The Director, Woman and Child Welfare Directorate, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Collector, District- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

4. District Programme Officer, Woman and Child Development Department, Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

5. Project Officer, Woman and Child Development Department, Saraipali, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar Kesharwani, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Mr. Shashank Thakur, G.A. for the State.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 25/10/17 This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been preferred by the petitioners for ventilating their grievances that the agreement executed between the petitioners and respondent No. 4 for supply of ready to eat food is for the period of 05 years which has been reduced to a period of 01 year behind the back of the petitioners.

2.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners would submit that the action of respondent No. 4 is arbitrary and contrary to law. 3.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the petitioner may prefer representation for the redressal of their grievances before the District Level Committee headed by the Collector and that will be considered and decided expeditiously. 4.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 5.

Be that as it may, the petitioners are at liberty to make a representation to the District Level Committee headed by the Collector and, in that event, the Collector/Committee shall consider and decide the petitioners' representation after hearing both the parties expeditiously preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

6.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka