Vineet Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPCR No.139 of 2015 Vineet Singh Through Managing Director, (Proprietor) Vineet Singh S/o Lat Sudhish Singh Aged About 39 Years, Maharana Pratap Colony, Yadunandan Nagar, P.S. Civil Line, Tifra District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh S/o Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Home, (Police), Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralay, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Superintendent Of Police Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh

3. Station House Office Police Station Vishrampur, Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioner :

Shri Apoorva Tripathi, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Shri D. R. Minz, Dy.G.A.

Order On Board 07/10/2015 This petition has been filed by the petitioner raising grievance that a written report submitted by the petitioner has not been registered against one, who has removed articles/valuable equipments from the construction site. 2.

On the other hand, learned State counsel submits that according to the respondents, the petitioner himself is responsible and in fact, the respondents have already taken action in the matter and according to the respondents, the background, in which, the report has been lodged by the petitioner requires proper enquiry and presently enquiry has been made and appropriate steps in accordance with law will be taken by the appropriate authority. 3.

In view of submission made by learned counsel for the parties, at this stage, the background, in which, the application has been made by the petitioner before the

police authorities, this petition is finally disposed off with a direction to respondents to complete the enquiry and take appropriate steps in the matter in accordance with the directions issued by the Supreme Court in the case of Lalita Kumari vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and Others1 .

Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge Tumane (2008) 7 SCC 164