Smt.Mridlarani And Others v. Smt.Sulochna Prakash And Others

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Second Appeal No. 609 of 2004 1.

Smt. Mridlarani Sahgal, wife of Shri Jagdish Sahgal, aged 45 years, Caste Isai, resident of Barpali Chowk Champa, resident of Dharmjaigarh, District Raigarh (deleted) 1.A Jogendar Singh, aged 52 years, 1.B Jagjeet Singh, aged 28 years, 1.C Jagmeet Singh, aged 26 years, Respondents No. 1 A to 1 C, Son of Sardar Jagdish Singh Sahgal, mother of Smt. Mradularani, resident of Dharmjaigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 2.

Smt. Keertipodwal, aged about 41 years, wife of Balkrishan, caste Isai, resident of Barpali Chowk, Champa, near City Kotwali, Raigarh (C.G.) ----Appellants

Versus

1.

Smt. Sulochna, aged 50 years, widow of Rajkamal Prakash. 2.

Rajeshprakash, aged 26 years, son of Rajkamal Prakash, (Bhutpurv Avyask mother Vali Maa Sulochna Prakash jo Ab Avyasak he ) 3.

Yogesh Prakash, aged 24 years, son of Rajkamal Prakash (Bhutpurv Avyask mother Vali Mala Sulochna Prakash jo Ab Avyasak he ) 4.

Vandanaprakash , aged 22 years, son of Rajkamal Prakash (Bhutpurv Avyask mother Vali Mala Sulochna Prakash jo Ab Avyasak he ) 5.

Namrata Prakash, aged 20 years, son of Rajkamal Prakash (Bhutpurv Avyask mother Vali Mala Sulochna Prakash jo Ab Avyasak he ) Respondents No. 1 to 5, resident of Barpali Chowk, Champa, Tahsil Champa (C.G.) 6.

Chhattisgarh State Purv me Madhyapradesh Sashan, through Collector Janjgir Champa 7.

Shobharani, aged 43 years, son of Ishaprakash, resident of Plot No. 128, Nikosabag, Chistian Colony, Nagpur, Maharashra 8.

Ashish Masih, aged 52 years, son of Banshi Masih, caste Isai, resident of Barpali Chowk, Champa, Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) ---- Respondents.

For appellants : None For State : Mr. R.K. Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 04/02/2019 1.

Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners even in two rounds, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the second appeal for want of prosecution. 2.

Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-