Puran Lal Thakur, v. State Of Chhattisgarh,

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 2027 of 2021 Puran Lal Thakur S/o S. B. Thakur, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village - Borid, Post - Gujra, Tahsil And Police Station - Doundi, District Balod Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Its Convener, Committee Of Senior Secretary, Transfer Matter, General Administration Department, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Police Station And Post - Rakhi, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Its Secretary, Committee Of Senior Secretary, Transfer Matter, General Administration Department, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Police Station And Post - Rakhi, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Transport, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralay, Police Station And Post - Rakhi, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Transport Commissioner, Chhattisgarh State, Indravati Bhawan, CBlock, 3rd Floor, Atal Nagar, Police Station And Post - Rakhi, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. Deputy Transport Commissioner, Office Of Transport Commissioner, Indravati Bhawan, C - Block, 3rd Floor, Atal Nagar, Police Station And Post - Rakhi, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

6. Regional Transport Officer, Office Of Regional Transport Officer, Infront Of Five Building, Near Malviya Chowk, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Abhishek Pandey with Ms. Laxmeen Kashyap, Advocates For State :

Mr. Sudeep Verma, Dy. Govt. Advocate

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 06.04.2021

1. At the outset, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to move a fresh representation to the respondents against the rejection of his representation filed against the order of transfer dated 23.08.2019 and wishes to highlight the observations made by the Writ Court in WPS No. 3935 of 2020 disposed on 07.10.2020 in his representation which according to the petitioner has not been duly considered by the authorities while deciding the representation.

2. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the writ petition at this juncture stands disposed of permitting the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the authorities concerned ventilating his grievance. On such representation being made, the authorities concerned are expected to decide the same in accordance with the provisions of law and the policy governing the field, at the earliest preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of the fresh representation of the petitioner.

3. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Khatai