← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3619/2016disposed off

Pramod Kumar Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-08-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3619 of 2016 Pramod Kumar Sharma S/o Dauram Sharma, Aged About 61 Years R/o Ward No 7 Janjgir, Tahsil Janjgir, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat And Gramin Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Commissioner, Cum Director, Panchayat Directoate Indirawati Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. Collector, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Sushobhit Singh, Advocate For Respondent-State : Shri S.P. Kale, Dy. A.G., on advance copy. S.B.:

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 11/08/2016 Heard on admission.

The transfer order is under challenge only on the ground that the petitioner is going to retire on 31.05.2017. It is submitted that as per transfer policy clause 2.10 which provides that the Government servants, who are going to retire within one year, may be posted in their home district or a place of their choice if permissible under the general book circular instructions. He submits that this aspect has not been considered while transferring the petitioner.

-22.

The grounds which have been raised by the petitioner requires consideration by the respondents.

3.

It is, however, found that the petitioner has not preferred any representation in terms of transfer policy and has rushed to this Court. Therefore, all that can be done is that in case, the petitioner prefers representation to the State Government within a period of ten days from today, the State Government shall consider and decide the same within a period of four weeks. For a period of four weeks, if any other person has not joined in the place of petitioner, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner.

4.

The petition is accordingly disposed off.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rekha