← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2959/2017disposed off

Shatrughan Kumar Sahu v. Indian Oil Corporation Limited

2017-11-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2959 of 2017 Shatrughan Kumar Sahu S/o J. C. Sahu, Aged About 30 Years R/o Post Nariyara, Tahsil Akaltara, Police Station Pamgarh, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Indian Oil Corporation Limited Through Its General Manager, Indian Oil Bhawan, Jail Road, Arera Hills, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh.

2. Chief Area Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Area Office Rajiv Gandhi Marg, Telibandha, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Collector, Janjgir- Champa, District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh.

4. Vishal Kedia, R/o P.O. - Champa, Near Railway Station, District JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh. 495671 ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Vaibhav Shukla, Advocate.

For Respondents :

Mr. N. Naha Roy, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Ashish Surana, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 20/11/17 1.

By way of this writ petition the petitioner is ventilating his grievances against the inaction of the respondent authorities for allotment of LPG distributorship to the respondent No. 4 contrary to the guidelines and policy. 2.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents No. 1 and 2 would submit that the petitioner has no locus to the allotment of the LPG distributorship and he can make a representation before the respondent authorities for redressal of his grievances.

3.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he may be allowed to make representation before the respondent authorities for redressal of his grievances.

4.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 5.

The prayer appears to be fair and reasonable and is accordingly allowed.

6.

Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to make a representation before the respondents No. 1 and 2 for redressal of his grievances who, in turn, shall consider and decide the petitioner's representation in accordance with the guidelines and policy laid down for LPG distributorship. 7.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka