← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2853/2017disposed off

Nandkishor Jain v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-10-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2853 of 2017 Nandkishor Jain S/o Late Shree Sampatlal Jain Aged about 55 years, R/o Vikas Nagar Kondagaon, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Transport Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Regional Transport Authority, Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents WPC No. 2861 of 2017 Nandkishor Jain S/o Late Shree Sampatlal Jain Aged about 55 years, R/o Vikas Nagar Kondagaon District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Transport Mantratralya Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Regional Transport Authority , Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents WPC No. 2866 of 2017 Dinesh Kumar Jain S/o Late Sampat Lal Jain Aged about 49 years, R/o Vikas Nagar Kondagaon, District Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department of Transport Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Regional Transport Authority, Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents

For Petitioners :

Mr. Santosh Gupta, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Mr. Ashish Surana, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 30/10/17 1.

Limited grievance of the petitioner is that the application for change of timing and extension of route in regular permit is pending since 05.09.2017 and direction may be issued to the respondent to decide the same expeditiously.

2.

State counsel has no objection if any such direction is issued to the respondent.

3.

The present petition is accordingly disposed of directing the respondent to decide the pending application of the petitioner dated 05.09.2017 if not already decided, as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 4.

It is made clear that this Court has if not observed anything on the merits of the case and it would be for the competent authority to act strictly in accordance with law.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka