Suresh Kumar Kurre v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2440 of 2015 Suresh Kumar Kurre S/o Chand Ram Kurre, Aged About 30 years, Posted As T.G.T. (Hindi) At Eklaya Aadarsh, Avasiya Vidhyalaya Chhote Mudpar, Kharsiya, P.S. Kharsiya, District Raigarh, Chhattisgargh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Tribal Development Mahandi Bhawan New Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector Raigarh & President District Level Chhattisgarh Aadim Jati Kalyan Aavasiya, Shaikshanik Snasthan Samiti Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

3. Assistant Commissioner, ( Lok Suchna Adhikari) Aadivasi Vikas Vibhag Shakaha, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner Shri F.S. Khare, Advocate For Respondent/State Shri P.K. Bhaduri, GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 09/07/2015 1.

With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally.

2.

The petitioner has assailed the legality and validity of the impugned order of suspension passed by the Collector, Raigarh on 14.07.2014 in exercise of powers under Rule 9 of Chhatttisgarh Civil Services

(Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966. He has also prayed for a direction to the respondent Nos.2 & 3 to supply copy of enquiry report and statement of witnesses to the petitioner. 3.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would inform that the departmental enquiry is almost complete, as the enquiry report has already been submitted, however, the matter remained pending since thereafter, therefore, the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to complete the departmental enquiry, in accordance with law, expeditiously. 4.

Considering the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to complete the enquiry proceeding against the petitioner and pass appropriate final order, in accordance with law, at the earliest, preferably within a period of three months from the date of submission of the certified copy of this order. 5.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case.

Sd/- JUDGE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA Nirala