Naresh Kumar Verma v. State Of C.G.
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2211 of 2021 1.
Naresh Kumar Verma S/o Shri Late Sewa Ram Verma Aged About 41 Years Occupation-Service, Posted As Assistant Block Education Officer At Block- Baladabazar, District- Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 2.
Rammilan Rawte S/o Late Bharat Lal Rawte Aged About 43 Years Occupation- Service, Posted As Assistant Block Education Officer At Block- Katevalyan, District- Dantewada, Chhattisgarh, District : Dantewada, Chhattisgarh 3.
Devnath Baghel S/o Shri Suberam Baghel Aged About 42 Years Occupation- Service, Posted As Assistant Block Education Officer At Block- Devbhog, District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh 4.
Ramakant Dewangan S/o Parmanand Dewangan Aged About 42 Years Occupation- Service, Posted As Assistant Block Education Officer At Block- Kasdol, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 5.
Divya Prakash Soni S/o Shri N. P. Soni Aged About 33 Years Occupation- Service, Posted As Assistant Block Education Officer At Block- Bilaigarh, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 6.
Durgesh Kumar Shori S/o Vishnu Ram Shori Aged About 35 Years Occupation- Service, Posted As Assistant Block Education Officer At Block- Bhanupratappur, District- Kanker, Chhattisgarh 7.
Smt. Anjani Mandavi W/o Shri Shailendra Mandavi Aged About 32 Years Occupation- Service, Posted As Assistant Block Education Officer At Block- Durgukondal, District- Kanker, Chhattisgarh 8.
Praveen Kumar Chaturvedi S/o Shri Pyarelal Chaturvedi Aged About 38 Years Occupation- Service, Posted As Assistant Block Education Officer At Block- Antagarh, District- Kanker, Chhattisgarh 9.
Ku. Bhavna Nareti D/o Indra Dev Nareti Aged About 32 Years Occupation- Service, Posted As Assistant Block Education Officer At Block- Charama, District- Kanker, Chhattisgarh 10.
Kamlesh Kumar Dhruv S/o Shatruhan Lal Dhruv Aged About 35 Years Occupation- Service, Posted As Assistant Block Education Officer At Block- Bhopalpatnam, District- Bijapur, Chhattisgarh 11.
Meenakshi Beck W/o Shri P. Beck Aged About 38 Years OccupationService, Posted As Assistant Block Education Officer At BlockJaijaipur, Sakti, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 12.
Chatur Singh Dhruv S/o Late Chhannu Lal Dhruv Aged About 42 Years Occupation- Service, Posted As Assistant Block Education Officer At Block- Farsabahar, District- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh
13.
Gopal Ram S/o Shri Tulsi Ram Aged About 41 Years OccupationService, Posted As Assistant Block Education Officer At BlockKasabel, District- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 14.
Indu Tirkey W/o Kariman Tirkey Aged About 35 Years OccupationService, Posted As Assistant Block Education Officer At Block- Batauli, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners
Versus
1.
State Of C.G. Through Principal Secretary School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2.
The Director Public Instructions, Chhattisgarh, Headquarter- Indrawati Bhawan, New Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :
Mr. Rakesh Pandey, Advocate For State :
Mr. Jitendra Pali, Dy. A.G.
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 11/06/2021 1.
The grievance of the petitioners in the present writ petition is the fact that the petitioners, who are working on the post of Assistant Block Education Officer, are not being considered for promotion to the post of Block Education Officer and they are also not being given the charge of Block Education Officer in the absence of a regular Block Education Officer.
2.
Under the Rules, 25% of the posts of Block Education Officer has to be filed from among the Assistant Block Education Officer, however, ignoring this aspect, according to the petitioners, in the recent past, the Government has given the charge of Block Education Officer to the Lecturers, overlooking or ignoring the claim of the petitioners, who
could be either promoted on regular basis on the post of Block Education Officer under the 25% quota that they have or could have been made the Incharge Block Education Officer till regular promotions are made.
3.
Given the limited grievance that the petitioners have, in the opinion of this Court ends of justice would meet if the writ petition at this juncture is disposed of directing the petitioners to raise a fresh representation in respect of their claim to the respondent No.2, who in turn shall scrutinize the claim of the petitioners and shall consider the same in accordance with the provisions of law and try to redress the grievance of the petitioners at the earliest preferably within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. 4.
With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved