Shyam Bai Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2086 of 2016 • Shyam Bai Sahu W/o Chhedram, Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Deori, Post Khorsi, Tahsil Pamgarh, Police Station Shivrinarayan, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary, Department Of Revenue Secretariat, Rajdhani Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Sub Divisional OfÏcer ( Revenue), Pamgarh, Tahsil Pamgarh, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa, (Chhattisgarh)

3. The Collector, Janjgir, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa, (Chhattisgarh)

4. The Tahsildar, Tahsil Pamgarh, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa, (Chhattisgarh)

5. Budhu Bani, S/o Ramji, R/o Village Deori, Post Khorsi, Tahsil Pamgarh, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa, (Chhattisgarh)

6. Ramnarayan Gir, S/o Kumar, R/o Village Deori, Post Khorsi, Tahsil Pamgarh, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondent For Petitioner Mr. Santosh Sahu, Advocate For Respondent/State Mr. Arun Sao, Dy. AG Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 22/8/2016

1. Heard.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the SDO (Revenue), Pamgarh, wherein, the land in question has been directed to be reentered in the name of State of Chhattisgarh.

3. It appears the SDO (Revenue) has found that the land has been set-apart for Nistari prupose for "Charai".

4. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the order, there are two remedies open to him, first under Section 57(2) of the C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959 (in short "the Code, 1959") for establishing his title and second, by preferring an appeal before the concerned Collector under the Code, 1959.

5. In view of the existence of statutory alternative remedy, the writ petition is not maintainable and it is accordingly dismissed, as not maintainable. Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna