← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1957/2021disposed off

Hemlata Tengwar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-04-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (SERVICE) NO. 1957 OF 2021 • Hemlata Tengwar, D/o Shri Vedishiram Tengwar, aged about 26 years, R/o Village and Post - Jairamnagar, Block Masturi, District Bilaspur (CG) ... Petitioner versus 1.

State of Chhattisgarh, through School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 2.

The Director, Public Interactions, Chhattisgarh, Indravati Bhavan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (CG) ... Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Ashwani Shukla, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Ms. Akansha Jain, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board /04/2021 1.

The limited grievance that Petitioner has in the present Writ Petition is the inaction on the part of Respondents in not deciding the representation which she has made for change of her cadre from Tribal to Education. 2.

Learned Counsel for Petitioner submits that when the Advertisement was issued, the application that the Petitioner made was all for the Education Department and she was also considered for the Education Department, however, due to inadvertence on the part of Petitioner instead of Education in the application she had typed as Tribal and therefore the appointment given to Petitioner is in the Tribal Department. Petitioner has immediately moved an application for change of her cadre and her representation that she has made is also still pending consideration.

3.

The limited request that Petitioner has made is not opposed by learned State Counsel, however, the learned State Counsel submits that any decision shall be taken purely in accordance with the rules and regulations and subject to verification of the application which the Petitioner has submitted.

4.

Considering the nature of dispute and the fact that the representation of Petitioner is still pending consideration, the present Writ Petition at this juncture is being disposed of directing the Respondent No.2 to consider the representation of Petitioner and decide the same within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

5.

Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed of with aforesaid observations. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) sharad JUDGE