Maa Gangai Shikshan Samity v. State Of C.G. And ORS.
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 7458 of 2007 Maa Gangai Shikshan Samiti, through its Secretary, S.D. Vaishnav, S/oLate Shri Vishram Das Vaishnav, R/o- Village Rawan, Ambuja Gram, TehsilBalouda Bazar, District- Raipur, C.G. ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.)
3. Chhattisgarh Board of Secondary Education Through its Secretary Office of C.G. Board of Secondary Education, Pension Bada, Raipur C.G.
4. District Education Officer Raipur, District Raipur C.G.
5. Block Education Officer Baloudabazar District Raipur C.G. ---- Respondents WPC No. 131 of 2008 Sarwahit Karini Shikshan Samiti Balaudabazar, Through its President - Smt Dulari Vaishnav, W/o. Shri Ram Rang Vaishnav, R/o. Garden Chowk, Near State Bank of India, Tehsil - Balouda Bazar, District. Raipur (C.G) ---- Petitioner Vs
1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.)
2. Chhattisgarh Board of Secondary Education Through its Secretary Office of C.G. Board of Secondary Education, Pension Bada, Raipur C.G.
3. District Education Officer Raipur, District Raipur C.G. ---- Respondents And WPC No. 130 Of 2008 Sarwahit Karini Shikshan Samiti Balaudabazar, Through its President - Smt Dulari Vaishnav, W/o. Shri Ram Rang Vaishnav, R/o. Garden Chowk, Near State Bank of India, Tehsil - Balouda Bazar, District. Raipur (C.G)
---- Petitioner Vs
1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.)
2. Chhattisgarh Board of Secondary Education Through its Secretary Office of C.G. Board of Secondary Education, Pension Bada, Raipur C.G.
3. District Education Officer Raipur, District Raipur C.G. ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Ravi Majumdar and Mr. Anup Majumdar, Adv. For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. R. S. Patel, Advocate.
For State : Mr. Prasoon Bhaduri, G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 27/11/17 Heard.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitions have become infructuous.
3.
Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka