← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2960/2017disposed off

Ma Bhuneshwari Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Chhirpani Through Smt. Sushila v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-11-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2960 of 2017

1. Ma Bhuneshwari Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Chhirpani Through Smt. Sushila W/o Gopal Singh Gond, Aged about 35 years, President Ma Bhuneshwari Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Chhirpani R/o Village Chhirpani, Post Kodwagudang, P. S. Kukdur, Tahsil Pandariya, District Kabirdham Kavardha Chhattisgarh.

2. Smt. Gouri, W/o Rajkumar Gond, Aged about 25 years, Secretary, Ma Bhuneshwari Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Chhirpani R/o Village Chhirpani, Post Kodwagudang, P. S. Kukdur, Tahsil Pandariya, District Kabirdham Kavardha Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat Department, New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Collector, Kabirdham Kavardha, District Kabirdham Kavardha, Chhattisgarh.

3. Sub Divisional Officer, Pandriya, District Kabirdham Kavardha Chhattisgarh.

4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Pandriya, District Kabirdham Kavardha Chhattisgarh.

5. Sarpanch, Grampanchayat Chhirpani, Pandriya, District Kabirdham Kavardha Chhattisgarh.

6. Secretary, Grampanchayat Chhirpani, Pandriya, District Kabirdham Kavardha Chhattisgarh.

7. Hemlata Markam, W/o Hori Lal Markam, Aged about 27 years, Village Chhirpani, Pandriya, District Kabirdham Kavardha Chhattisgarh.

8. Janki Bai, W/o Nandulal Yadav, Aged about 30 years, Village Chhirpani, Pandriya, District Kabirdham Kavardha Chhattisgarh.

9. Rajkumari Shyam, W/o Rajkumar Shyam, Aged about 25 years, Village Chhirpani, Pandriya, District Kabirdham Kavardha Chhattisgarh. 10.Savitri Markam, W/o Chhannu Markam, Aged about 26 years, Village Chhirpani, Pandriya, District Kabirdham Kavardha Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Rajesh Jain, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Mr. Dhiraj Wankhede, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 08/11/17 1.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners would submit that the petitioners' have made a complaint to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Pandariya against the illegality committed by respondents No. 7 to 10 which is pending consideration since 12.06.2017 and has not been decided till date.

2.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.

Be that as it may, the Sub-Divisional Officer, Pandariya is directed to consider and decide the petitioners' complaint expeditiously preferably within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 4.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka