← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWA/184/2018disposed off

Sapura Bai Chhurga v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-04-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WA No. 184 of 2018 Sapura Bai Chhurga W/o Sundarman Aged About 57 Years R/o Chandanpara Labour Camp, A C C Jamul Ward No. 13 , District Drug Chhattisgarh.

---- Appellant

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Labour Secretary And Labour Commissioner , Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. President , State Industrial Court Of Chhattisgarh At Raipur , Mahanadi Khand, Near D K S Bhawan Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Pragatisheel Cement Shramik Sangh Labour Camp Jamul Bhilai District Durg Chhattisgarh.

4. General Manager ( Now Vice President ) The Associated Cement Companies Limited , Registered Under Indian Companies Act With The Registrar Of Companies , Bombay , Registered Office At Cement House 121, Maharshi Karve Road , Mumbai - 20 Carrying On Manufacture Of Cement In The Name Of Jamul Cement Works At Jamul Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh Through Its Vice President I. M. Sharma . ---- Respondents _________________________________________________________ For Appellant :

Shri Puneet Ruparel, Advocate.

For State:

Shri Y.S. Thakur, Additional Advocate General. Hon'ble Shri Pritinker Diwaker and Hon'ble Shri Sanjay Agrawal, JJ.

Order On Board 16/04/2018 Per Pritinker Diwaker, J.

1. Shri Puneet Ruparel, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that identical matter i.e Writ Appeal No. 98/2018 arising out of the same judgment has already been disposed of and therefore, the present appeal can also be disposed of in terms of the same order .

2. State counsel does not dispute the factual position.

3. We have perused the order dated 19.02.2018 passed by this Court in Writ Appeal No. 98/2018.

4. Considering the submission of the parties, the present appeal is disposed of in terms of the order dated 19.02.2018 passed by this Court in Writ Appeal No. 98/2018.

5. The petitioner/appellant, if so advised, may avail the remedy available to him under the law.

Sd/- Sd/- (Pritinker Diwaker) (Sanjay Agrawal) Judge Judge Yogesh/Nikita