← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5977/2017disposed off

Meenu Kewat v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-11-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 5977 of 2017 • Meenu Kewat, W/o Shri Ravi Kant Patwar, Aged About 33 Years, Presently Posted as Assistant Teacher (Panchayat) At Primary School, Kankoj, Block Bharatpur, District Koriya, R/o Village & Tahsil Bharatpur, District Koriya Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Bharatpur, District Koriya Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner Shri P. K. Saxena, Advocate For Respondent-State Ms. K. T. Rao, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 10/11/2017 1.

Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 28.09.2017, by which the petitioner has been transferred from Primary School, Kannoj, District Koriya to Primary School, Junva, District Koriya on the ground of administrative exigency.

2.

The ground raised by the petitioner is that the impugned order has been passed in violation of the transfer policy issued by the State Government.

3.

Considering the facts situation of the case, it would be appropriate to allow the petitioner to prefer a representation before the concerned competent authority raising his grievance against the impugned transfer order.

4.

Let the petitioner prefer representation within a period of 4 weeks from today and thereafter, the concerned competent authority shall consider and decide the same within the next 8 weeks, in accordance with law and on its own merits.

5.

For a period of 12 weeks or till the representation is decided, whichever is earlier, the status quo, as it exists today, in respect of the petitioner's posting, shall be maintained. 6.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. 7.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case.

Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Nirala