← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3764/2016disposed off

G. C. Bind v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-08-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3764 of 2016 • G. C. Bind S/o Late Shri Ramanand Bind, Aged About 60 Years Fisheries Inspector, Block Gurur, Posted In The Office Of Assistant Director, Fisheries Balod, Distirct Balod, Civil And Revenue District Balod Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Agriculture, Fisheries Department Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya New Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Director, Fisheries, Chhattisgarh Indrawati Bhavan, 4th Floor, New Raipur Chhattigarh

3. Assistant Director, Fisheries, Balod District Balod Chhattisgarh

4. Shri C.P. Sharma, Fisheries Insector, Posted In The Office Of Assistant Driector, Fisheries, Kondagaon, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri MK Sinha, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Shri D. R. Minz, Dy.GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 12/08/2016 The transfer order is under challenge on the ground that the petitioner was posted in scheduled area for last 8 years and thereafter, by the impugned transfer order, he has again been transferred to another scheduled area to accommodate respondent No.4, who remained posted in the scheduled area for a period of 8 months only and he is being transferred on his own request. 2.

Considering that the petitioner has already remained posted in the scheduled area for a period of 8 years, his case requires consideration in terms of government transfer policy dated 03-06-2015 & 11-06-2016, wherein it was

provided that a government servant, who was posted in the scheduled area for a long time, his case required to be considered for being posted outside the scheduled area.

3.

The petitioner has already preferred representation. The respondent authority may consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of four weeks. In addition, there are other personal difficulties, which have been raised in the petition, the same may also be considered by the respondent authority.

4.

With the aforesaid observation, this petition is finally disposed off. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Tumane