Ramesh Kumar Dhiwar v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2987 of 2017
1. Ramesh Kumar Dhiwar S/o Kejuram Dhiwar, Aged about 47 years, R/o Village Akaltari, P.O. Lakhram, Police Station Ratanpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Smt. Uttra Dhiwar, W/o Chaitram Dhiwar, Aged about 29 years, R/o Village Akaltari, P.O. Lakhram, Police Station Ratanpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
3. Pradeep Kewat, S/o Baldau Kewat, Aged about 32 years, R/o Village Akaltari, P.O. Lakhram, Police Station Ratanpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioners
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of School Education, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
3. Sub Divisional Officer (R), Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
4. District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
5. Block Education Officer, Bilha, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
6. Smt. Sanyogita Kashyap, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Akaltari, Block Bilha, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents For Petitioners :
Mr. Sushobhit Singh, Advocate.
For Respondents/State :
Mr. Arun Sao, Dy. Adv. General.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 09/11/17 1.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners would submit that petitioners / parents have made a representation before the Sub-Divisional
Officer (Revenue) / District Education Officer, Bilaspur on 22.08.2017 against the shifting of school premises of Government Middle School, Akaltari to Government Primary School, Bhatapara but that has not been decided till date.
2.
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 3.
Be that as it may, the Collector shall depute an officer, not below the rank of District Education Officer to visit the school premises and thereafter take a decision on the petitioners' representation expeditiously preferably within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 4.
With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka