Sudhuram Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2100 of 2016 • Sudhuram Yadav S/o Late Deuram Yadav, Aged About 68 Years R/o Village Rasmada, Post Rasmada, Tahsil Durg, Police Station Pulgaon, Civil And Revenue Distrirct Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Chief Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Sub Divisional OfÏcer, ( Revenue) District Durg Chhattisgarh

3. Tahsildar, Tahsil & District Durg Chhattisgarh

4. Sarpanch, Village Panchayat, Rasmada, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioner Mr. Ashok Patil, Advocate For Respondent /State Mr. B. Gopakumar, Dy. AG Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 22/8/2016

1. Heard.

2. The petitioner's application under Section 85 of the Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam has been dismissed by the SDO (Revenue), Durg.

3. The petitioner has an alternative remedy of preferring an appeal before the Collector, therefore, the writ petition is not maintainable.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, as not maintainable. However, the petitioner may prefer a duly constituted appeal within a period of 15 days from today along with an application for grant of interim relief before the appellate authority. If such appeal/application is filed, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the said authority, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 03 months. Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna