High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5929/2017disposed off

Dr. Shailesh Daura v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-11-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 5929 of 2017 • Dr. Shailesh Daura S/o Shri Bholeshwar Daura, Aged About 32 Years Medical OfÏcer (Contractual), Posted At Community Health Center, Devbhog, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralay, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Director, Health Services, Block-1, 3rd Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Collector, Gariyaband, District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh

4. The Chief Medical And Health OfÏcer, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh

5. The Block Medical OfÏcer, Community Health Center, Devbhog, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioner Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate For Respondent /State Ms. Tripti Rao, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 8/11/2017 (1) Heard.

(2) Challenge in this petition is to the impugned order dated 23.10.2017 (Annexure P/1), whereby, the petitioner has been transferred from Community Health Center, Devbhog, District

Gariyaband to Primary Health Centre, Jhakharpara, Block Devbhog, District Gariyaband.

(3) At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation before the respondent authorities raising his grievances in respect of his transfer.

(4) No objection from the other side.

(5) Looking to the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a representation before the respondent authorities within a period of 15 days and thereafter, the competent authorities is directed to consider and decide his representation in accordance with law, as early as possible, preferably within a period of 4 weeks from the date of its submission along with certified copy of this order. (6) It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law on its own merits.

Sd/- J u d g e (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna