High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/729/2018disposed off

Vishnu Kumar Agrawal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-03-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 729 of 2018 Vishnu Kumar Agrawal, aged about 41 years, S/o Laxminarayan Agrawal, R/o Sadar Bazar Bilaspur, Police Station City Kotwali, Tahsil, Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur (C.G.) Mo. No.:- 9893355805 ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Urban Administration & Develop Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Raipur, P.S. Kewli, Tahsil & District - Raipur, Civil & Revenue District - Raipur (C.G.)

2. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Home Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Raipur, P.S. Kewli, Tahsil & District - Raipur, Civil & Revenue District - Raipur (C.G.)

3. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Bilaspur, P.S. Civil Line, Tahsil, Civil & Revenue District - Bilaspur (C.G.)

4. Bhawan Adhikari, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, P.S. Civil Line, Tahsil Civil & Revenue, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

5. Superintendent of Police, Bilaspur, Police Station Civil Line, Tahsil Civil & Revenue, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

6. Station House Officer, Police of Police Station Tarbahar, Bilaspur, Tahsil, Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur (C.G.)

7. Gulam Mohammad @ Kallu, aged about 70 years, S/o Late Gulam Mustfa, R/o Khaparganj Mohalla Bilaspur, Police Station City Kotwali, Tahsil Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Ratnesh Kumar Agrawal, Advocate.

For State : Shri Dilman Rati Minj, Deputy Advocate General. Order On Board 16/03/2018 (1) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made an application for temporary injunction before the trial Court , which is pending consideration since long and, therefore, the same may be directed to be decided expeditiously. (2) Prayer appears to be fair & reasonable and accordingly the same is allowed.

(3) Be that as it may, the trial Court is directed to consider and decide the petitioner's application for temporary injunction in accordance with law expeditiously after hearing the affected parties.

(4) With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-