Smt. Shanta Bai Paikara v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2995 of 2017 Smt. Shanta Bai Paikara W/o Dasharu Paikara, Aged about 48 years, Post Sarpanch, Gram Amodi, Post Kargi Police Station Girodhpuri, Tahsil Kasdol, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat & Rural Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) & Prescribed Authority, Tahsil Kasdol, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

3. Chandram Yadav S/o Baharta Ram Yadav, posted as Up- Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Amodi, Post Kargi, Police Station Girodhpuri, Tahsil Kasdol District Balodabazar - Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

4. District Education Officer, Balodabazar District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Yogesh Chandra, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 10/11/17 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a complaint / representation against the respondent No. 3- UpSurpanch of Gram Panchayat Amodi before the Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue), District- Balodabazar but that has not been considered and no action has been taken against respondent No. 3 till date. 2.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3.

Be that as it may, the Sub-Divisional Officer, District- Balodabazar is directed to consider the petitioner's representation and take a decision strictly in accordance with law expeditiously. 4.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the petitioner's case be considered in accordance with law.

5.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka