Kshama Bansal v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3011 of 2017 Kshama Bansal W/o Manish Bansal, Aged about 30 years, R/o Post Office Road, Post Kharsiya, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Revenue and Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Secretary, Public Works Department, Government of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
4. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) cum Land Acquisition Officer, Tehsil Office, Kharsiya, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
5. Tehsildar, Kharsiya, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents WPC No. 3022 of 2017 Neeraj Bansal W/o Ramawtar Bansal, Aged about 36 years, R/o Post Office Road, Post Kharsiya District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Revenue and Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Secretary, Public Works Department, Government of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
4. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) cum Land Acquisition Officer, Tehsil Office, Kharsiya, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
5. Tehsildar, Kharsiya, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents
For Petitioners :
Mr. Sourabh Dangi, Advocate.
For Respondents/State :
Mr. Aditya Sharma, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 13/11/17 1.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner would submit that he may be allowed to make a representation before the respondent No. 3Collector, Raigarh for redressal of his grievances and the respondent No. 3 be directed to consider and decide the same expeditiously. 2.
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.
The prayer appears to be fair and reasonable and is accordingly allowed.
4.
Be that as it may, the petitioner would be at liberty to make a representation before the Collector, Raigarh for redressal of his grievances and, in that event, the Collector shall do well to consider the petitioner's representation and take decision expeditiously preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 5.
With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka