Dr. Krishna Pratap Pandey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 955 of 2020 Dr. Krishna Pratap Pandey S/o Keshav Prasad Pandey, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Old Bus Stand, Imlipara, Gali No. 02, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh through District Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

2. Tahsildar, Bilha, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. Anil Mudda And Sons, Karta -Anil Mundda, S/o Shri Vishnu Gopal Mudda R/o Maheshwari Cole Benifikeshan And Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Village Parsada, Sirgitti Industrial Area, Tifra, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

4. Ramkhilavan R/o Ladha Nagar Panchayat Bodri, Tehsil Bilha, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Neeraj Choubey, Advocate For State :

Ms. Sunita Jain, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 19.03.2020

1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order Annexure P-1 dated 27.01.2020 passed by the Additional Collector in Claim Case No. 46/A-12/2018-19.

2. At the outset, this Court is of the opinion that the writ petition would not be maintainable for the reason that there is a remedy of revision

available to the petitioner against the order of the Additional Collector which would lie to the Commissioner.

3. Given the said fact, reserving the right of the petitioner to avail the remedy available under the statutory provisions, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

4. Subject to the petitioner preferring a revision before the Revisional Authority, it is expected that the Revisional Authority shall promptly take a decision and decide the same in accordance with law. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Khatai