← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/3039/2017disposed off

Kavita Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-11-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3039 of 2017

1. Kavita Sahu W/o Amrit Bariha, Aged About 25 Years Panch Gram Panchayat Kewatapali, R/o Village Kewatapali, Tehsil Basna, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

2. Rupanand Sao S/o Narendra Sao, Aged About 35 Years Panch Gram Panchayat Kewatapali, R/o Village Kewatapali, Tehsil Basna, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

3. Vishakha Sahu W/o Shantilal Sahu, Aged About 37 Years Panch Gram Panchayat Kewatapali, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village Kewatapali, Tehsil Basna, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Commerce and Industries Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Collector, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

3. District Manager, Food and Civil Supplies Corporation, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

4. Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Kewatapali, Tehsil Basana, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

5. Vinita Agrawal W/o Pawan Agrawal, Rice Miller R/o Village Kewatapali, Tehsil Basna, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Sanjay Patel, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 14/11/17 1.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners would submit that the petitioners have made an application to the Collector, Mahasamund on 13.09.2017 for restraining illegal construction of Rice Mill by respondent No.

6, which has not been considered and decided till date and, therefore, directions may be issued to expedite the same. 2.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.

Be that as it may, the Collector, Mahasamund is directed to consider and disposed of the petitioners' application / representation strictly in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 4.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

SD/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka