Dr. Jamaluddin Qureshi v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1885 of 2015 Dr. T. Kanta Rao S/o Late T. Keshvan, Aged About 49 Years R/o Main Road, Rajendra Nagar, Near Rawan Putla, P O : Telibandha, Ravigram, Amlidih, Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Director, Health Services, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3. Collector, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
4. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. WPC No. 1884 Of 2015 Dr. Zaheer Khan S/o Late M. R. Khan, Aged About 65 Years R/o Behind Rukmani Gas, Ringh Road No. 1, Mathpurena, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Vs
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Director, Health Services, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Collector, Raipur Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh
4. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Raipur, Chhattisgarh WPC No. 2191 Of 2015 Dr. Shahid Khan S/o Late Dr. Zaheer Khan, Aged About 35 Years R/o Behind Rukmani Gas, Ring Road No. 1, Mathpurena, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner Vs
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur,
Chhattisgarh.
2. Director, Health Services, Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
3. Collector, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
4. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. WPC No. 3106 Of 2017 Dr. Jamaluddin Qureshi S/o Shri Ziyauddin Qureshi, Aged About 60 Years Qureshi Clinic, R/o Village Hathband, Near Railway StationHathband, Police Station Simga, Tahsil And District Balodabazar, Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioner Vs
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Director, Office Of Director Health Service, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3. Collector, District Balodabazar, Chhattisgarh.
4. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Office Of C. M. O. Balodabazar, District Balodabazar, Chhattisgarh.
And WPC No. 3071 Of 2017 Dr. Punendra Kumar Rajak S/o Shri Bihari Lal Rajak, Aged About 60 Years Rajak Clinic At Near Karma Chowk, Ram Nagar At Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. R/o H. No. 438/182, Gali No. 02, Near Shiv Mandir Gokul Nagar, Raipur, Police Station Gudhiyari, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioner Vs
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Director, Office Of Director Health Services, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3. Collector, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
4. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Office Of C. M. O. Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
For Petitioners : Shri Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate in WPC Nos. 1885/2015, 1884/2015 & 2191/2015.
For Petitioners : Shri Jameel Akhtar Lohani, Advocate in WPC Nos. 3106/2017 & 3071/2017 For State : Shri Arun Sao, Dy. Advocate General.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 11/12/2017 (1) Since common question of law and fact is involved in all the writ petititions, they are being disposed of by this common order. (2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have made applications under the provisions of Chhattisgarh Rajya Upcharyagrah Tatha Rogopchar Sambandhi Stapnaye Anugyapan Adhiniyam, 2013 (henceforth 'Adhiniyam, 2013') for their registration in the State Medical Register but the same has not been considered and decided till date and, therefore, they may be permitted to file fresh application for registration and the same may be directed to be decided expeditiously. (3) Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the State would submit that the application filed by the petitioners for registration under Adhiniyam, 2013 has been considered and decided.
(4) I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. (5) Be that as it may, the petitioners are at liberty to file fresh application for registration under the Adhiniyam, 2013 before the respondent No. 4 and, in turn, the respondent No. 4-Chief Medical and Health Officer, Raipur shall consider and decide the same expeditiously preferably within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. (6) With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stand finally disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-