High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2177/2019disposed off

Gulab Singh Banjare v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-03-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2177 of 2019

1. Gulab Singh Banjare S/o Late Shri P.S. Banjare Aged About 41 Years Address Govt. High School Sulouni, Block - Malkharoda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

2. Bhusan Lal Banjare S/o Late Shri Sudharam Banjare Aged About 42 Years Address Govt. High School Suluoni Block Malkharoda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

3. Ramnaresh Ajgalle S/o Late Shri Ramsanehi Ajgalle Aged About 46 Years Address Village And Post Malkharoda, Block Malkharoda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

4. Tikeshwar Prasad Sahu S/o Shri Laxman Prasad Sahu Aged About 49 Years Address Govt. High School Mahagodhi, Block Malkharoda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

5. Dinesh Kumar Dewangan S/o Shri Murlidhar Dewangan Aged About 49 Years Govt. High School Mahagodhi, Block Malkharoda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary School Education Department New Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The District Education Officer Sakti, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

3. The Block Education Officer Block Education Office, Malkharoda, District Janigir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

4. Bhusan Lal Banjare S/o Late Shri Sudharam Banjare Aged About 42 Years Address Govt. High School Suluoni Block Malkharoda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Neeraj Pradhan, Advocate For State :

Mr. Saleem Kazi, Dy. AG Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 27/03/2019

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner stands squarely covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in case of Asha Saxenas Vs. State of MP & Ors. 2009 (3) MPJR (SC) 59.

2. The issue pertains to grant of two advance increments on successful completion of B.Ed. course before appointment on own expenses.

3. On verification, counsel for the State submits that the matter can be disposed of for consideration of the petitioner's case in the light of decision of the Supreme Court in case of Asha Saxena (Supra).

4. Given the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the counsel for either side, the present petition stands disposed of. The respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner for grant of two advance increments as per circulars prevailing in the State Government after verification of the facts pleaded by the petitioner, and in case if it is found that the petitioner is similarly placed, appropriate benefit be provided to him forthwith. Let this exercise be done within a period of 90 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands allowed and disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit