Ghanshyam Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2548 of 2015

1. Ghanshyam Yadav S/o Shri Kashiram Yadav, Aged about 32 years, Working as Dress Grade -2 Primary Health Cente, Ganiyari Post Ganiyari P.S. Kota District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

2. Manharan Singh S/o Shri Maha Singh, Working as Dresser Grade -2, Primary Health Centre Aamadand Pendra Post Aamadand, P.S. Pendra, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

3. Shiv Kumar Pandey S/o Late Lala Ram Pandey, Aged about 58 Years Working As Dress Grade -2 Primary Health Cente, Moch, P.S. Takhatpur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

4. Ram Singh Raj S/o Shri Charan Singh Raj, Aged about 42 Years Working as Dress Grade -2 Primary Health Cente, Darrighat, Post Darrighat, P.S. Masturi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

5. Ramayan Prasad Sahu S/o Shri Paklu Ram Sahu, Aged about 50 Years Working As Dress Grade -2 Community Health Center Masturi, Post And P.S. Masturi District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

6. Narmada Prasad Pyasi S/o Shri Mithila Prasad Pyasi, Aged about 56 Years Working as Dress Grade -2 Primary Health Cente, Kenda, Block Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Director, Health Services, Sanchanalaya Health Services Indrawati Bhawan, 3rd Floor, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Medical and Health Officer Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri C. J. K. Rao, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Shri Sangharsh Pandey, Dy. Govt. Adv.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 17/07/2015 The petitioner through the instant petition has raised his grievance pertaining to the arbitrary action on the part of the respondents in not granting promotion to him to the post of Dresser Grade-1 from the present post of Dresser Grade-II.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that so far as the Dresser Grade-II in the other District of Chhattisgarh is concerned, their cases have already been

considered and they have been granted promotion as early as June, 2013 and October, 2013 but the petitioner has been denied. He further submits that the petitioner has already made repeated representations to the respondents but the same till date have not been decided.

At this juncture, without entering into the merits of the case this Court feels it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the respondent No.3 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a reasonable period.

Needless to mention that in the event if the respondents find that the petitioner is not entitled for the relief claimed for, the representation shall be objectively decided by a speaking order communicating the same to the petitioner.

With the aforesaid observation, the instant petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P Sam Koshy) Bhola Judge