← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2558/2015disposed off

Sushil G. Naidu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2015-07-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2558 of 2015 Sushil G. Naidu S/o Shri Ganpat Naidu Aged About 68 years, Occupation Head Clerk (Retired), R/o Vilage Kalipur, P.S. Dharampura, No. 2, District Jagdalpur (Bastar), Chhattsigarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Home And Police Affairs And Finance Mahandi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. The Director General Of Police Police Head Quarter, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. The Joint Director Principal Treasury Accounts And Pension, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents WPS No. 2566 of 2015 Namdeo Meghani S/o Late Shri M.M. Meghani, Aged About 68 years, Occupation- Sub Inspector (M), (Retired), Resident Of A-15, Quarter No. 2, Baisgarh, Police Station Baisgarh, District- Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Home And Police Affairs And Finance Mahandi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. The Director General Of Police Police Head Quarter, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. The Joint Director Principal Treasury Accounts And Pension, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioners Shri Prakash Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent/State Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. AG

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 22/07/2015 1.

At the very outset, learned counsel for the parties would submit that the matter has already been considered by this Court in WP(S) No.4523/2014 (Francis Xavier Beck and others vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others and other connected matters) and WP (S) No.1975/2015 (A.P. Tripathi and others vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others and other connected matters) and final orders have been passed in the said matters on 03.07.2015 and 16.07.2015 respectively, therefore, the present writ petitions may be disposed of in terms of Francis Xavier Beck (supra) and A.P. Tripathi (supra) 2.

In view of the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the parties, both the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of Francis Xavier Beck (supra) and A.P. Tripathi (supra). Sd/- JUDGE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA Nirala