High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCC/231/2018allowed

Junior Engineer/ Assistant Engineer v. Gomti Bai

2018-04-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ram Prasanna Sharma2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 231 of 2018

1. Junior Engineer/ Assistant Engineer Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board (Now C.S.P.D.C.L.) Tahsil Devbhog, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Chief Engineer, Junior Engineer/assistant Engineer Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board (Now C.S.P.D.C.L.) Office Gariyaband, Tahsil And Thana Gariyaband, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. President/ Chairman Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board (Now C.D.P.D.C.L.) Office Daganiya, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicants

Versus

1. Gomti Bai W/o Late Shri Bodhan Singh Aged About 32 Years Cast Gond, R/o Village Gohra Padar, Police Station And Tahsil Devbhog, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh (Minor Hence Represented By Natural Guardian Gomti Bai), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Jhumuk Lal S/o Late Shri Bodhan Singh Aged About 12 Years Cast Gond, R/o Village Gohra Padar, Police Station And Tahsil Devbhog, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh (Minor Hence Represented By Natural Guardian Gomti Bai), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicants :

Mr. Vikas Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents :

Mr. Wasim Miyan, Panel Lawyer -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Ram Prasanna Sharma Order On Board 06/04/2018

1. Heard on application for rectification of order dated 10th February, 2018 in First Appeal No. 94/2012.

2. Learned counsel for the parties submit that both the parties have compromised the dispute for Rs. 3,16,000/- which is apparent from the docket. However, in the order dated 10.02.2018 the word "in addition" has wrongly been typed, therefore, the same may be rectified.

3. On due consideration, application for rectification of order dated 10th February, 2018 in First Appeal No. 94/2012 is allowed.

4. It is directed that in the eight and ninth line of para-1 it be read as by way of compensation to the amount awarded by the learned Tribunal and the word "in addition" is deleted, the other part of the order shall remain same.

5. With such observation, the instant MCC stands disposed of. C.C. Today.

Sd/- (Ram Prasanna Sharma) Judge Santosh