Vijay Thakur v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Appeal No. 369 of 2015 1.

Vijay Thakur S/o Shri Dhanurjay Thakur, Aged about 37 years, Shiksha Karmi Grade III At Government Primary School Bajadi, Block Mainpur, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh.

2.

Tularam Pradhan S/o Shri Chintaram Pradhan, Aged about 34 years, Shiksha Karmi Grade III at Government Primary School Bharuwamuda, Block Mainpur, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh.

---- Appellants

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2.

The Director, Director of Panchayat, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3.

The Collector, Gariyaband District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh 4.

The Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Gariyaband, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh 5.

The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Mainpur, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh 6.

Prakash Kashyap S/o Shri Sheetal Singh Aged about 32 years, Shiksha Karmi Grade III at Government Primary School, Anesar, Block Mainpur, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh.

7.

Dutiyaram Durga S/o Shri Gopiram Durga, Aged about 32 years, Shiksha Karmi Grade III at Government Primary School, Adivasipara, Block Mainpur, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh.

8.

Jeevanlal Yadav S/o Shri Khiruram Yadav, Aged about 37 years, Shiksha Karmi Grade III at Government Primary School, Mudamahan, Block Mainpur, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Appellants :

Shri K. Rohan, Advocate.

For Respondent/State :

Shri B. Gopa Kumar, Deputy Advocate General.

Hon'ble Shri Navin Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri P. Sam Koshy, J.

Judgment on Board Per Navin Sinha, Chief Justice 04/08/2015 1.

IA No. 1 of 2015 has been filed to condone delay of 23 days in filing the appeal. Considering the duration, delay is condoned. 2.

The present appeal arises from order dated 6.5.2015 dismissing Writ Petition (S) No. 1724 of 2015 declining to interfere with the termination of the Appellants from the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade III on the ground of illegality in the appointment.

3.

Learned Counsel for the parties are agreed that issues arising for consideration stand covered by the discussion in the order dated 29.7.2015 in Writ Appeal No. 364 of 2015 and Writ Appeal No. 365 of 2015 and that this appeal may also be disposed in similar terms. 4.

The writ appeal is disposed in the aforesaid terms. Sd/- Sd/- (Navin Sinha) (P. Sam Koshy) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE Subbu