Smt. Sangeeta Sone v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2616 of 2015
1. Smt. Sangeeta Sone W/o Shri Omprakash Sone, Aged About 28 years Presently Working As Data Entry Operator In Vishwavidyalaya Engineering College, Lakhanpur, Distt. Surguja, (Chhattisgarh)
2. Motilal Chakradhari S/o Shri Faglal Chakradhari Aged About 35 Years Presently Working As Peon/ Skill Attendant In Vishwavidyalaya Engineering College, Lakhanpur, Distt. Surguja, (Chhattisgarh)
3. Santosh Kumar Patel S/o Shri Bodhiram Patel Aged About 29 Years Presently Working As Workshop Trainer In Vishwavidyalaya Engineering College, Lakhanpur, Distt. Surguja, (Chhattisgarh)
4. Anuklal S/o Shri Bachhai Singh Aged About 43 Years Presently Working As Peon In Vishwavidyalaya Engineering College, Lakhanpur, Distt. Surguja, (Chhattisgarh)
5. Gulshan Kumar Sahu S/o Shri D.P. Sahu Aged About 24 Years Presently Working As Peon In Vishwavidyalaya Engineering College, Lakhanpur, Distt. Surguja, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioners
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Government of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
2. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Technical Education, Manpower Planning, Science And Technology, Government of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
3. The Registrar, Surguja University, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja, (Chhattisgarh)
4. The Principal Vishwavidyalaya Engineering College, Lakhanpur, Distt. Surguja Affiliated With The Surguja University, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioners :
Shri Sushil Dubey, Advocate For Respondents/State :
Shri Sangharsh Pandey, Dy. GA for the State
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 23/07/2015
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue the representation.
2. It is ordered, as prayed for.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra ashu