← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/3187/2017disposed off

Sita Ram v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-11-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3187 of 2017

1. Sita Ram S/o Manikchand, aged about 35 years, Caste Aghariya, R/o Village Kankeva Patwari Halka Number 17, Revenue Circle Saraipali, Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh

2. Tilak Ram S/o Manikchand, aged about 30 years, Caste Aghariya, R/o Village Kankeva Patwari Halka Number 17, Revenue Circle Saraipali, Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh

3. Kumar, S/o Benu, aged about 28 years, Caste Sanwara, R/o Village Kankeva Patwari Halka Number 17, Revenue Circle Saraipali, Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh

4. Tuklal, S/o Piladau, aged about 30 years, Caste Raut, R/o Village Kankeva Patwari Halka Number 17, Revenue Circle Saraipali, Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Police Station Rakhi, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector, Mahasamund District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh

3. The Tahsildar, Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Mr. S. Majid Ali, Panel Lawyer for the State. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 28/11/17 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners' application for grant of lease in respect of government land is pending consideration before the Collector, Mahasamund since 06.09.2016 and, therefore, directions may be issued to expedite the same.

2.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 3.

Be that as it may, the Collector, Mahasamund is directed to consider and dispose of the petitioners' application expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order after hearing the affected parties.

4.

It is made clear that this Court has not made any opinion on the merits of the case.

5.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka