Mamta Kankrane v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WA No. 135 of 2021 • Mamta Kankrane W/o Shri Govind Kankrane Aged About 50 Years, Caste Lodhi, Occupation Agriculture, R/o Village Manpur, Tahsil Manpur, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ---- Appellant

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The Collector, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

3. The Sub Divisional OfÏcer (Revenue) Mohla, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

4. The Tahsildar Manpur, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

5. Gram Panchayat, Manpur, Through: Its Secretary, Block Manpur, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Appellant :

Shri Punit Ruparel, Adv.

For State/Respondents :

Shri Sudeep Agrawal, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, Acting Chief Justice & Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Order on Board 08/07/2021 Per Prashant Kumar Mishra, Acting Chief Justice. Proceeding through video conferencing.

1. The petitioner had approached directly against the order passed by the Tahshildar, therefore, the Writ Petition has been dismissed on the ground of existence of alternative remedy.

2. After hearing learned counsel for the appellant, we do not find any ground for interference with the order passed by the learned Single Bench.

3. Appellant has statutory remedy of preferring an appeal under

Section 44 of the C.G. Revenue Code, 1959, therefore, he has efÏcacious alternative remedy.

4. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Sd/- Sd/- (Prashant Kumar Mishra) (Rajani Dubey) Acting Chief Justice Judge H.L. Sahu