High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2174/2019disposed off

Horilal Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-03-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2174 of 2019 Horilal Sahu S/o Shri Khorbahra Ram Sahu Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Kukra, Gram Panchayat Kukra, Gram Tahsil Arang, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Sub Divisional Officer(Revenue) Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Gram Panchayat Kukra, Tahsil Arang, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh Through Gram Panchayat Kukra, Tahsil Arang, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. C. R. Sahu, Advocate For State :

Mr. Saleem Kazi, Dy. AG Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 27/03/2019

1. The substantial grievance of the petitioner in the instant case is that the petitioner was initially appointed as a Peon under the respondents No. 4 dated 20/04/2000 and the petitioner was working on the said post till 13/04/2018. When abruptly the petitioner's service was terminated by a oral order, the petitioner had made repeated approach to the higher authorities in the department. The petitioner has enclosed Annexure P-5 which is an application made to the

Collector as well as to the Sub Divisional Officer which till date has not been decided.

2. Given the nature of the submissions that the petitioner has made and the fact that the petitioner had worked for a period of 18 years under the respondent No. 3. This Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would meet if the respondent No. 2 and 3 are directed to decide the representation/appeal of the petitioner so far as the terminating of service is considered, at the earliest in accordance with the rules governing the field within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit