← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPCR/540/2017disposed off

Dwarika Prasad Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-12-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPCR No. 540 of 2017 Dwarika Prasad Sahu S/o Sarayu Prasad Sahu Aged About 69 Years R/o Village Pawani, Police Station Bilaigarh, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Home Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Inspector General Of Police, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Superintendent Of Police, Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

4. Station House Officer, Through Police Station Bilaigarh, District Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

5. Kamal Kishor Sahu S/o Banwari Sahu, R/o Amanaka Police Station Amanaka, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

6. Banwari Lal Sahu Working As Assistant Sub Inspector, And Posted At Police Station Amanaka, Raipur, District Raipur, R/o Amanaka Police Station Amanaka, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :

Mr. R.S.Patel, Advocate For State Respondents :

Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Dy. Govt. Advocate --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 08.12.2017 Heard 1.

The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the FIR dated 29.08.2017 against the Respondents No.5 & 6, the police is sitting over the matter and no actions are being taken; therefore, only the limited prayer is that the police may be directed to expedite their act in filing challan or filing of closure report. 2.

Considering the limited prayer, it is directed that since the FIR is registered, the police cannot sit over the same for the time immemorial. Consequently, they are directed to take action and arrive at a certain opinion and may file the charge sheet or the

closure report. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any observation on the merits of the case.

3.

With such observation, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Ashok