Girdhar Prasad Sarthi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2282 of 2016 Girdhar Prasad Sarthi S/o Ramadhar Sarthi Aged About 39 Years R/o Village & Post Thuskela Tah Kharisiya District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through, The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Social Welfare, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Raigarh, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

3. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Kharsiya, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For State :

Shri S.P. Kale, Dy.A.G.

S.B.:

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 22/06/2016 Heard on admission.

1. The transfer of the petitioner vide order dated 18.4.2016 passed by respondent No.2 has been challenged on the ground that the petitioner is not surplus employee as per the policy. The Block Eduction Officer, Kharsiya, vide his memo dated 28.4.2016/9.5.2016 has informed respondent No.2 that if the petitioner is shifted, there will be only one teacher in the school and, therefore, he is not surplus.

2. It appears that the information sent by the Block Education Officer is pending before the Chief Executive Officer of Jila Panchayat, which prima facie shows

-2that transfer has been made by wrongly treating the petitioner as surplus. Respondent No.2 should consider this aspect in the matter of memo dated 28.4.2016/9.5.2016 of the Block Education Officer, Kharsiya. A decision should also be taken within a period of 15 days.

3. Till the matter is decided finally by respondent No.2-Chief Executive Officer in this manner, the petitioner shall not be disturbed/relieved if already not relieved.

4. With the aforesaid observation, the petition is finally disposed off. Sd/-- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Praveen