← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPHC/9/2016dismissed

Sheikh Aabid v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-08-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (HC) No. 9 of 2016 Sheikh Aabid S/o Late Sheikh Darbar, Aged About 41 Years Caste Musalman, R/o Village Chhotebarela, Semarchuwa Road, Tahsil Mungeli, Civil District Bilaspur And Revenue District Mungeli (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The S. P. Mungeli District Mungeli (Chhattisgarh)

2. Station House Officer, Police Station Jarhagaon District Mungeli (Chhattisgarh)

3. Umesh Sahu, S/o Shatrughan Sahu, Aged About 25 Years Caste Teli, R/o Ward No. 6, Mahamaya Ward, Musalman Mohalla, Near Bilaspur Mungeli Road, Takhatpur, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)

4. Ku. Aashoo Bano, D/o Sheikh Aabid, Aged About 17 Years Caste Musalman, R/o Village Chhotebarela, Semarchuwa Road, Tahsil Mungeli, Civil District Bilaspur And Revenue District Mungeli (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents Shri Mirza Hafeez Baig, Advocate along with the petitioner. Shri Vivek Sharma, Government Advocate for the State/ respondents 1 and 2.

Shri Ravindra Sharma, Advocate for respondents 3 and 4. Respondent 4 is present in person.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker & Hon'ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai

ORDER

Per P. Diwaker, J.

01/08/2016 1.

Heard.

2.

This is a Habeas Corpus petition filed by the petitioner for issuing directions to respondents 1 and 2 regarding search/production of his

daughter, respondent 4.

3.

On a specific query made by this Court to respondent 4, who happens to be the daughter of the petitioner, she states that on 3.6.2016 she has performed marriage with Umesh Sahu, respondent 3 in Aarya Samaj Mandir, Raipur and is also having a certificate of the marriage. She submits that she is major and now she is a married lady, living with her husband happily at her own will. She further submits that even she does not want to talk to her father and is no more interested to live with him.

4.

In view of the above statement of respondent 4, nothing remains in the petition to be adjudicated upon.

5.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition(HC) is dismissed. Sd/ Sd/ (Pritinker Diwaker) (Chandra Bhushan Bajpai) Judge Judge sunita