Umashankar Gajpal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.3309 of 2017

1. Umashankar Gajpal S/o Anand Ram Gajpal, Aged About 45 Years R/o Village And Post Nardha, Tehsil Dhamdha, District Durg, Chhattisgarh

2. Dushyant Kumar Sahu S/o Jagannath Sahu, Aged About 31 Years R/o Village Mohdi, Post Nardha, Tehsil Dhamdha, District Durg, Chhattisgarh

3. Basant Kumar Sahu S/o Hariram Sahu, Aged About 49 Years R/o Village And Post Belhari, Tehsil Patan, District Durg, Chhattisgarh

4. Tikeshwar Sahu S/o T.L.Sahu, Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Chirputi, Post Matwari, Tehsil Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Health, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director, Health Services, Directorate Of Health Indrawati Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, District Durg, Chhattisgarh

4. Block Medical Officer, Block Dhamdha, District Durg, Chhattisgarh

5. Block Medical Officer, Block Patan, District Durg, Chhattisgarh --- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. R.S. Baghel, Advocate For State :

Mr. Dhiraj Wankhede, Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 08/12/2017 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made an application under the provisions of Chhattisgarh Rajya Upcharyagrah Tatha Rogopchar Sambandhi

Sthapnaye Anugyapan Adhiniyam, 2013 (henceforth "Adhiniyam, 2013") for registration before respondent authorities, but the same has not been considered and decided till date and, therefore, he may be permitted to file fresh application for registration before the respondent authorities and the same may be directed to be decided expeditiously. (2) Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the State would submit that the application filed by the petitioner for registration under Adhiniyam, 2013 has been decided.

(3) I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. (4) Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to file fresh application for registration before the respondent authorities under the Adhiniyam, 2013 and, in turn, the respondents authorities shall consider and decide the same expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. (5) With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-