Uraj Kumar Mishra v. State Of Chhattisgarh

FEE :& } '

IN THE HIGH CCURT OF JUDICATURE CF GIATI'ISGARW AT :

BILASPUR CRIMINAL REVIsxcN No.(4£.§b£ 2001.

AEpliCant.

:::

Uraj Kumar mishra, aged about 4O years, San G£ $hri R.P.Mishra.

Océupatinn-Agricu}turj,st_ Resident o£ mNcJx/lé, KasturbaNagar_ Near Pam: Ki Tanki,Bhopal.

M.P.

Ver$ U3 .

.- Respanc1ent. : : :

The Thrnugh State the Ecanomic T.I .

Bhcp of£ence a1.

Bureau, i CRIMINAL REVISION UNDER SECTION 397/401 OF THE CODE OF @IMINAL PROCEDURE FOR DISCF-TARGING TLYE AF'PLIICANT FRGM THE .OFFEIECES PUNISHABLEwER SEC.

FREVEN'IICN IZO-B,420l467,471 CF CCRRUPTICN OF THE IPC ACT:

Réw.

988.

Sec.

8 OF TW'E '

\

m WGXYA/jc?/g/'ai 201 @ mmuiaigwz) wwwm mwmééimn awimm i S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant k umar Mishra /

001. 450/20 - ;21.01.2015 '

Cr. R. Nos. 411/2 51 and 481/2001 Shri Manoj Mishra, counselfor he applicant in Cr. R. No. 411/2001.

Shri Adhiraj Surana,~Dy. G.A.f r the State.

Learned counsel for the app icant would submit that the criminal r3v?sion has been rendered infructuot is because the trial itself has come to } 'an end.

Acébrdingly, the revision applic'

ations are dismissed as infructuous.

'

.

SdlPrashant Kumar Mishra Judge