High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2624/2018disposed off

Ram Prasad Sidar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-03-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2624 of 2018 Ram Prasad Sidar S/o Shri Budhwar Singh Aged About 53 Years Caste Sanwra (S.T.) Occupation Head Master, And Posted As Hostel Superintendent At Post Metric Tribal Boys Hostel, Bhisma, Block And District Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribes Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Upper Secretary, Department Of Tribal And Scheduled Caste, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Commissioner Secretary, Department Of Tribal And Scheduled Caste, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Director, Lok Shikshan Sanchanalaya, Chhattisgarh, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. The Collector, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh.

6. District Education Officer, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh.

7. Manohar Singh Kanwar Aged About 50 Years Lecturer (English) At Govt. High School Padaniya, Block Katghora, District- Korba, Chhattisgarh.

----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Badal Lal Bhardwaj, Advocate For State :

Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 27/03/2018

1. Only grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents have ignored the candidature of the petitioner for promotion from the post of Headmaster to the post of Lecturer inspite of the fact that the petitioner has got all the requisite eligibility criteria and experiences.

2. He submits that the respondent No.7 who is identically placed has been granted this benefit ahead of the petitioner and therefore his claim may also be considered.

3. However perusal of the record would show that the petitioner till date has not represented before the respondents to ventilate his grievances.

4. Accordingly, this Court is inclined to dispose off the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation in this regard to the concerned respondents, who in turn shall consider the case of the petitioner in comparison with the respondent No.7 and shall pass a suitable order at the earliest.

5. The writ petition thus stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved