← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1946/2019disposed off

Nande Muchaki v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-03-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1946 of 2019 Smt. Nande Muchaki W/o Shri Sobhajhu Ram Muchaki Aged About 32 Years R/o Saraswati Ward No. 03, Dornapal, Post And Thana Dornapal District Sukma, Chhattisgarh. Assistant Teacher (LB) At Govt. Kanya Aashram Jagargunda School, Janpad Panchayat Konta, District Sukma Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Sukma, District Sukma, Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Konta, District Sukma Chhattisgarh.

4. Block Education Officer Block Konta, District Sukma Chhattisgarh. ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Ghanshyam Kashyap, Advocate For State :

Mr. Rahul Mishra, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 19/03/2019

1. The only grievance which the petitioner has raised in the present writ petition is the granting of the benefit of revised pay scale from the date he has completed 8 years of service and which in fact has been paid to the petitioner late w.e.f. 28.06.2017.

2. According to the petitioner, since he joined duty on 26.07.2008, he completes 8 years of service on 25.07.2016 and as such the benefit of revised pay scale should have been given to him from 25.07.2016 on wards but the same has been extended to him only w.e.f. 28.06.2017.

-23. Given the limited nature of dispute which the petitioner has raised, let the petitioner make a detailed representation in this regard to respondents 2 & 3 within a period of 3 weeks from today, in addition to the representation that he has already made. On such representation being made, respondents 2 & 3 shall decide the same in accordance with the rules and regulations as also the circulars of the State Govt. in this regard at the earliest preferably within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioner.

4. With the aforesaid observation the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved